Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 2830
Case name: Bishop v. Ontario (Minister of Transportation and Communications)
Date: 1975-05-30
Jurisdiction: Canada - Ontario
Court: Land Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Birnamwood Investments Limited   Claimant
  Bishop, Isobel   Claimant
  Bishop, Percy   Claimant
  Sheppard Parkway Apartments (East) Limited   Claimant
  Ontario (Minister of Transportation and Communications)   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Ford, Gordon W. Vice-Chairman
  Hobart, George M. Member
  Middleton, Donald W. Member
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Chaplick, Elliott   Claimant
  Pallett, John C.   Claimant
  Lockett, P.W.   Respondent
  Robinson, Robert B.   Respondent
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Moehring, George G. Appraiser Claimant
  Sepejak, John Planner Claimant
  Strung, Joseph Appraiser Claimant
  Ozog, Thadeus (Ted) Appraiser Respondent
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application to the Ontario Land Compensation Board for determination of compensation payable to the Claimants by the Respondent pursuant to the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1970, c. 154. Full taking of two parcels of land located in the Borough of Etobicoke. The land was taken for the purpose of upgrading Highway 27. The Board awarded compensation in the amount of $364,295 plus interest and costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1975] EXLAW 58 Ont. L.C.B. 1975-02-21
  Later
 
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1975] EXLAW 61
Parallel citations: (1975) 8 L.C.R. 134
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023