Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Access Property Services

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 213
Case name: Surrey Animal Hospital Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 1997-01-07
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Surrey Animal Hospital Ltd.   Appellant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Esson, William A. J.A.
  Hinkson, Ernest Edward J.A.
  Rowles, Mildred Anne J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Melville, J. Bruce   Appellant
  Hincks, Alan V.W.   Respondent
  Sharma, Neena   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the owner from a compensation award made by the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board following an expropriation conducted pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.B.C. 1987, c. 23. Full taking of a parcel of land located in Surrey. The land was taken for highway purposes. At the date of expropriation, the land was developed with a veterinary clinic operated by the Appellant. Prior to the hearing before the Board the parties had agreed that it was not feasible to relocate the business. The Board awarded compensation totalling $815,568. At issue on the appeal were several disturbance damage claims. The appeal was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1993] EXLAW 50 B.C. E.C.B. 1993-07-15
  [1993] EXLAW 182 B.C. C.A. 1993-09-24
  Later
 
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1997] EXLAW 213
Parallel citations: (1997) 68 A.C.W.S. (3d) 288
  (1997) 85 B.C.A.C. 297
  [1997] B.C.J. No. 5
  (1997) 32 B.C.L.R. (3d) 128
  1997 Can LII 2542
  1997 CarswellBC 878
  (1997) 60 L.C.R. 259
  (1997) 138 W.A.C. 297
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023