| Case name: |
British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways) v. Dunn |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Dunn, James |
|
Claimant |
| |
Dunn, Janis |
|
Claimant |
| |
British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Esson, William A. |
C.J.S.C. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Cosburn, Robert S. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Walters, Jean M. |
|
Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by the authority for an order for possession. Although the authority had taken proceedings pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.B.C. 12987, c. 23, including the filing of a vesting notice, the Claimants had remained in possession of the property. They alleged that they had an agreement allowing them to remain for a longer period. The application for possession was granted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related decisions: |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier |
| |
| |
Later |
| |
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1995] EXLAW 180 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
[1995] B.C.J. No. 2187 |
| |
(1995) 58 L.C.R. 41 |
|
|
|
