link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Expropriation Law Centre

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1795
Case name: Sutcliffe v. Ontario Hydro
Date: 1983-03-04
Jurisdiction: Canada - Ontario
Court: Land Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Sutcliffe, Ben   Claimant
  Sutcliffe, Fred, Jr.   Claimant
  Sutcliffe, Fred, Sr.   Claimant
  Ontario Hydro   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Middleton, Donald W. Member
  Singer, Vernon M. Chairman
  Worrall, James Vice-Chairman
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Tufman, Marek Z.   Claimant
  Zinman, Bram M.   Claimant
  Crompton, Kenneth G.   Respondent
  Genest, Pierre   Respondent
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Beatty Engineer Claimant
  Blainey, Ronald Valuator Claimant
  Carson, John A. Valuator Claimant
  Stamm, Gary Economist Claimant
  Charlesworth, David L. Engineer Respondent
  Chart, Edwin J. Engineer Respondent
  Field, Larry Planner Respondent
  Wolman, Frank Valuator Respondent
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application to the Ontario Land Compensation Board for determination of compensation payable to the Claimants following the expropriation of an electric transmission line easement pursuant to the Expropriations Act, R.S.O, 1980, c. 148. At the date of expropriation the subject property was being used for a landfill and sewage disposal business. The subject property was located in eastern Ontario near Napanee. The parties had previously agreed that the market value of the easement rights taken was $18,500. The Board awarded $62,000 for mitigation costs and $35,000 for business loss which was rounded to $100,000, plus interest and costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
 
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1983] EXLAW 27
Parallel citations: (1983) 27 L.C.R. 283
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024