| Case name: |
Terasen Pipelines (Corridor) Inc. v. R & M Schroter Enterprises Ltd. |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Alberta |
|
| Court: |
Court of Queen's Bench |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Terasen Pipelines (Corridor) Inc. |
|
Appellant |
| |
ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. |
|
Respondent |
| |
ATCO Midstream Ltd. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Cold Lake Pipeline Limited |
|
Respondent |
| |
Encana Pipelines Ltd. |
|
Respondent |
| |
G.F.M. Construction Ltd. |
|
Respondent |
| |
J-Dan Farms Ltd. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Marwood Cedar Homes Limited |
|
Respondent |
| |
R&M Schroter Enterprises Ltd. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Schroter, Robert |
|
Respondent |
| |
Simmons, Helen |
|
Respondent |
| |
Slater, Grace |
|
Respondent |
| |
Strathcona No. 20 (County) |
|
Respondent |
| |
Wright, Avrum |
|
Respondent |
| |
Wright, Karyl |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Ross, J.M. |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
O'Keeffe, Karen |
|
Appellant |
| |
Runnalls, Erin |
|
Appellant |
| |
Bishop, Deborah P. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Buss, Karin E. |
|
Respondent |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Wasmuth, John F. |
Appraiser |
Appellant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by three owners for an order deeming a report dealing with a pattern of dealings be inadmissible in an outstanding appeal hearing. It was held that the report was admissible and the application was dismissed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neutral citation: |
2012 ABQB 741 |
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2012] EXLAW 27 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(2012) 224 A.C.W.S. (3d) 672 |
| |
[2012] A.J. No. 1290 |
| |
(2012) 552 A.R. 356 |
| |
(2012) 108 L.C.R. 1 |
|
|
|
