| Case name: |
Yale Hotel Co. Ltd. v. Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Co. |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Grand Forks and Kettle River Railway Co. |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Yale Hotel Co. Ltd. |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Company |
|
Defendant |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Walkem, George Anthony |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Clement |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
MacNeill, Albert Howard |
|
Defendant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by two Plaintiffs in separate legal actions for continuation of an ex parte injunction and application by the Defendant for an order dissolving the injunction. The Plaintiffs were seeking declarations in the main actions that the Defendant railway company's attempt to expropriate land from the Plaintiffs for its railway operations was invalid. An interim injunction had been granted earlier prohibiting expropriation proceedings by the Defendant. It was ordered that the interim injunction should be continued until trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related decisions: |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier |
| |
| |
Later |
| |
[1902] EXLAW 3 |
B.C. S.C.F.C. |
1902-03-25 |
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1902] EXLAW 1 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
[1902] B.C.J. No. 19 |
| |
(1902) 9 B.C.R. 66 |
|
|
|
