| Case name: |
Day v. Klondike Mines Railway Co. |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Yukon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Boyle |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Day, Albert H. |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Hamilton |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
McDonald |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
N.A.T. & T. Co. |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Treadgold |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Chute, Jerome A. |
|
Defendant |
| |
Dawson, Grand Forks and Stewart River Railway Corporation |
|
Defendant |
| |
Klondike Mines Railway Company |
|
Defendant |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Craig, James |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Black, George |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Ridley, H.E. |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Stacpoole, Frank J. |
|
Plaintiff |
| |
Ashbaugh, R.L. |
|
Defendant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Applications by six mineral claim owners for an injunction to prevent construction of a railway over mining claims held by the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs alleged that procedural requirements for a Railway Act expropriation had not been satisfied. The court found that the Defendants had not filed a proper plan and book of reference as required by the Act. An injunction was granted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related decisions: |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier |
| |
| |
Later |
| |
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1905] EXLAW 3 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(1905) 2 W.L.R. 205 |
| |
[1905] Y.J. No. 5 |
|
|
|
