Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Expropriation Law Centre

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1026
Case name: Thomson Land & Cattle Co. v. British Columbia
Date: 2005-05-05
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Thomson Land & Cattle Co. Ltd.   Claimant
  British Columbia   Authority
  Charleyboy, Ervin   Other
  Chilcotin Band of Indians   Other
  Doe, Jane   Other
  Doe, John   Other
  Hance, Ray   Other
  William, Roger   Other
Before: Decision maker Designation
Ralph, Bryan J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  White, Donald S.   Claimant
  Akey, Michael C.   Authority
  Thompson, Glen Robert   Authority
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Action by the Claimant for compensation for the loss of use of a portion of its land resulting from the finding of ancient human remains on the Claimant's ranch located near Williams Lake. Prior to discovery of the remains in 1996, the Claimant had been engaged in excavation of a rock deposit to permit eventual agricultural use of the land. However, after discovery the Province appointed an archaeologist to evaluate the site. In addition, a First Nations group asserted title to the burial site. The Claimant voluntarily ceased its use of a 25 ac. portion of the subject property. Subsequently, the Province and the Claimant entered into two agreements that purported to deal with use of the subject property.

It was held that the Heritage Conservation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 187 did not provide for a compensation award in these circumstances because there had been no designation of the subject property pursuant to s. 9 of the Act. The Act was not a bar to a voluntary payment of compensation by the Province. However, the agreements were found to be unenforceable. The action was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
 
Neutral citation: 2005 BCSC 662
ExLaw citation: [2005] EXLAW 314
Parallel citations: [2005] B.C.J. No. 1007
  (2005) 86 L.C.R. 276
  (2005) 31 R.P.R. (4th) 83
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023