| Case name: |
Romaniuk v. Edmonton (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Alberta |
|
| Court: |
Supreme Court - Trial Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Haarsma, Dirk |
|
Claimant |
| |
Haarsma, Gerald (Gary) |
|
Claimant |
| |
Haarsma, John |
|
Claimant |
| |
Piska, Marria |
|
Claimant |
| |
Romaniuk, Alexander |
|
Claimant |
| |
Romaniuk, Alice |
|
Claimant |
| |
Romaniuk, Nettie |
|
Claimant |
| |
Thomas, Annie |
|
Claimant |
| |
Edmonton (City) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Milvain, James Valentine Hogarth |
C.J.T.D. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Agrios, Jack N. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Wilson, H.F. |
|
Authority |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Wall, James E. |
Appraiser |
Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by the Claimants to the Alberta Supreme Court for a declaration. The Authority had expropriated a right of way for an electric power transmission corridor. However, the subject property had been designated previously by the Province as a Restricted Development Area (RDA). The Claimants sought the declaration to establish whether the compensation award should take the RDA designation into account or whether it should be ignored. The court held that it should be ignored. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1977] EXLAW 1 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
[1977] 2 A.C.W.S. 457 |
| |
[1977] A.J. No. 368 |
| |
(1977) 6 A.R. 185 |
| |
(1977) 3 Alta. L.R. (2d) 289 |
| |
(1977) 77 D.L.R. (3d) 625 |
| |
(1977) 12 L.C.R. 293 |
| |
(1977) 3 M.P.L.R. 18 |
|
|
|
