Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 569
Case name: Waugh v. Pedneault
Date: 1947-11-04
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Esquimalt Lumber Company Limited   Claimant
  Waugh, James Stephenson   Claimant
  Pedneault   Authority
Before: Decision maker Designation
Bird, Henry Irvine J.A.
  O'Halloran, Cornelius Hawkins J.A.
  Smith, Sidney Alexander J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Haldane, W.H.M.   Claimant
  Harvey, R.D.   Authority
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the Claimants from a court order appointing a board of arbitrators pursuant to the expropriation procedures found in the Forest Act, R.S.B.C. 1936, c. 102. The Claimants argued that the appointment of arbitrators should have been adjourned or stayed pending the outcome of a separate legal action brought by the Claimants challenging the validity of the expropriation. The Authority was a logger who held timber rights and had commenced expropriation proceedings to acquire an access right of way over an existing logging road constructed on the Claimants' own timber property. The appeal was allowed. Costs of the appeal were awarded to the Claimants.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1947] EXLAW 1 B.C. S.C. 1947-08-19
  Later
  [1948] EXLAW 1 B.C. S.C. 1948-03-04
  [1948] EXLAW 2 B.C. S.C. 1948-04-20
  [1948] EXLAW 3 B.C. C.A. 1948-11-05
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1947] EXLAW 2
Parallel citations: [1947] B.C.J. No. 49
  1947 Can LII 453
  1947 CarswellBC 78
  [1947] 2 W.W.R. 933
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023