link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 2806
Case name: Hulmann v. Durham (Board of Education)
Date: 1974-12-06
Jurisdiction: Canada - Ontario
Court: Land Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Hulmann, Antoinne   Claimant
  Durham (Board of Education)   Respondent
  Durham (Region) Roman Catholic Separate School Board   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Ford, Gordon W. Vice-Chairman
  Hobart, George M. Member
  Marriott, G.P. Member
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Loudon, Robert M.   Claimant
  Couch, Hugh J.   Respondent
  Murphy, Russell J.   Respondent
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Beaton, John Wallace Appraiser Claimant
  Curtis, W.E. Engineer Claimant
  Bell, Charles E.B. Appraiser Respondent
  Bullied, Douglas J.M. Appraiser Respondent
  Young, Gerald I.M. Appraiser Respondent
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application to the Ontario Land Compensation Board for determination of compensation payable to the Claimant by the Respondents pursuant to the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1970, c. 154. Two expropriations conducted by two expropriating authorities which together acquired all of the Claimant's land. The subject property was located in the City of Oshawa and had a total area of about 22 ac. The Board awarded compensation in the total amount of $467,500 plus interest and costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
  [1976] EXLAW 51 Ont. C.A. 1976-04-26
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1974] EXLAW 50
Parallel citations: (1974) 7 L.C.R. 152
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024