| Case name: |
Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Co. v. Milsted |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
| Court: |
Supreme Court (Full Court) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Company |
|
Appellant |
| |
Milsted, Hannah Mary |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Clement, William Henry Pope |
J. |
| |
Irving, Paulus Aemilius |
J. |
| |
Martin, Archer Evans Stringer |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Reid, Robie L. |
|
Appellant |
| |
Brydone-Jack, Arthur C. |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Appeal from a compensation award made by a panel of arbitrators appointed pursuant to the Railway Act, R.S.C. 1906, c. 37. Compensation was payable in respect of the expropriation of a right of way for railway purposes. The arbitrators had awarded $2,950 for the right of way and $1,200 in respect of water supplied on the subject property. The appeal was dismissed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1908] EXLAW 3 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(1908) 13 B.C.R. 364 |
| |
(1908) 7 W.L.R. 384 |
|
|
|
