| Case name: |
Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Co. v. Milsted |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Milsted, Hannah Mary |
|
Claimant |
| |
Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Company |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Clement, William Henry Pope |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Brydone-Jack, Arthur C. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Reid, Robie L. |
|
Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Appeal by an owner from an award of costs to the railway company pursuant to the Railway Act, S.C. 1903, c. 58. It was held that the costs of obtaining a warrant for possession should be borne by the Claimant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related decisions: |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier |
| |
| |
Later |
| |
[1908] EXLAW 3 |
B.C. S.C.F.C. |
1908-01-17 |
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1907] EXLAW 1 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
[1907] B.C.J. No. 33 |
| |
(1907) 13 B.C.R. 187 |
| |
(1907) 7 Can.Ry.Cas. 257 |
|
|
|
