Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1454
Case name: Costello v. Calgary (City)
Date: 1987-10-01
Jurisdiction: Canada - Alberta
Court: Court of Queen's Bench
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Costello, Elizabeth Jean   Plaintiff
  Dickhoff, Mary Ann   Plaintiff
  Calgary (City)   Defendant
Before: Decision maker Designation
Virtue, Charles G. J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Mason, Frank A.   Plaintiff
  Abougoush, Adel A.   Defendant
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: The Plaintiffs were seeking damages for trespass in the main action. The claim arose from an entry on to the Plaintiffs' property by the Defendant City of Calgary pursuant to an expropriation that was later determined to be invalid. On this application to determine a preliminary issue the Defendant alleged that the action had been commenced after the time limit for doing so had expired and sought a declaration to that effect. It was held that the trespass action had not been commenced within the applicable time limit. Costs were awarded to the Defendant.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1980] EXLAW 16 Alta. Q.B. 1980-02-18
  [1981] EXLAW 18 Alta. C.A. 1981-02-06
  [1981] EXLAW 56 S.C.C. 1981-06-15
  [1983] EXLAW 17 S.C.C. 1983-01-25
  Later
  [1989] EXLAW 2 Alta. C.A. 1989-07-04
  [1990] EXLAW 8 S.C.C. 1990-01-25
  [1994] EXLAW 15 Alta. Q.B. 1994-04-12
  [1995] EXLAW 31 Alta. Q.B. 1995-01-06
  [1997] EXLAW 27 Alta. C.A. 1997-09-08
  [1998] EXLAW 20 S.C.C. 1998-03-05
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1987] EXLAW 5
Parallel citations: (1987) 7 A.C.W.S. (3d) 257
  [1987] A.J. No. 908
  (1987) 81 A.R. 282
  (1987) 55 Alta. L.R. (2d) 97
  (1987) 38 L.C.R. 145
  [1988] 1 W.W.R. 379
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023